Skip Navigation

Neuro-Oncology 2008 10(4):624-630; doi:10.1215/15228517-2008-010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carden, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carden, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Society for Neuro-Oncology

What is the risk of intracranial bleeding during anti-VEGF therapy?

Craig P. Carden, James M.G. Larkin and Mark A. Rosenthal

Drug Department Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK (C.P.C., J.M.G.L.) and Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (M.A.R.)

Address all correspondence to Craig Carden, Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, London, UK SM2 5PT (craig.carden{at}icr.ac.uk).


   Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key mediator of physiological and pathological angiogenesis. All solid tumors are dependent on pathological angiogenesis, and anti-VEGF therapy has demonstrated clinical benefit in breast, colorectal, non-small-cell lung, and renal carcinomas. Central nervous system metastases are common in many of these tumor types. An increased risk of bleeding has been reported with anti-VEGF therapy, but the risk of intracranial bleeding is unknown with this type of therapy. We reviewed the available data to investigate the risk of intracranial bleeding with anti-VEGF therapy in the presence and absence of CNS metastases. The PubMed and Medline databases and the Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meetings were searched for articles, abstracts, and presentations of clinical trials. We identified 57 trials examining the safety and efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy in a total of 10,598 patients. Four trials examined the use of anti-VEGF therapy in treating patients with brain metastases. The presence of CNS metastases was a stated exclusion criterion in 76% of trials. The rate of intracranial bleeding was negligible. We conclude that there is no trial evidence that anti-VEGF therapy confers an increased risk of intracranial bleeding, even in the presence of CNS metastases. Future trials of anti-VEGF therapy should not exclude patients with controlled CNS metastases at enrollment.

Keywords: anti-VEGF therapy, bleeding, cancer, central nervous system, metastases

Received September 19, 2007; Accepted January 4, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. Besse, S. F. Lasserre, P. Compton, J. Huang, S. Augustus, and U.-P. Rohr
Bevacizumab Safety in Patients with Central Nervous System Metastases
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2010; 16(1): 269 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. A. Socinski, C. J. Langer, J. E. Huang, M. M. Kolb, P. Compton, L. Wang, and W. Akerley
Safety of Bevacizumab in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2009; 27(31): 5255 - 5261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.