Skip Navigation

Neuro-Oncology 2009 11(5):550-555; doi:10.1215/15228517-2009-006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quant, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, P. Y.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Quant, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, P. Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright 2009 by the Society for Neuro-Oncology

Role of a second chemotherapy in recurrent malignant glioma patients who progress on bevacizumab

Eudocia C. Quant, Andrew D. Norden, Jan Drappatz, Alona Muzikansky, Lisa Doherty, Debra LaFrankie, Abigail Ciampa, Santosh Kesari and Patrick Y. Wen

Division of Cancer Neurology, Department of Neurology (E.C.Q., A.D.N., J.D., S.K., P.Y.W.), and Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center (E.C.Q., A.D.N., J.D., L.D., D.L., A.C., S.K., P.Y.W.), Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School (E.C.Q., A.D.N., J.D., S.K., P.Y.W.); Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatics Center (A.M.); Boston, MA, USA

Address correspondence to Patrick Y. Wen, Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital, SW430, 44 Binney St., Boston, MA 02115, USA (pwen{at}partners.org).


   Abstract

Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that has efficacy in recurrent malignant gliomas, particularly in combination with irinotecan. However, responses are rarely durable. Continuation of bevacizumab in combination with another chemotherapeutic agent may demonstrate some activity. In this article we present a retrospective review of 54 patients with recurrent malignant gliomas who progressed on a bevacizumab-containing regimen and were then treated with an alternate bevacizumab-containing regimen. All patients received intravenous bevacizumab (5–10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks alone or in combination with an additional chemotherapeutic agent, such as irinotecan. There was no limit on the number of prior therapies. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were reviewed. Tumor progression was determined by a combination of clinical status and radiographic changes. Patients were 33 men, 21 women (median age, 50 years; range, 23–72 years) with a median KPS score of 80 prior to the first bevacizumab-containing regimen and 70 prior to the second regimen; median prior chemotherapy regimens including the first bevacizumab-containing regimen was 3 (range, 2–5). Median progression-free survival (PFS) on the first bevacizumab-containing regimen was 124 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 87–154 days); 6-month (6M)-PFS was 33%. Median PFS on the second bevacizumab-containing regimen was 37.5 days (95% CI, 34–42 days); 6M-PFS was 2%. Ten patients on the first regimen and 12 patients on the second regimen suffered grade 3/4 toxicities. Those patients with malignant gliomas who progressed despite a bevacizumab-containing regimen rarely responded to the second bevacizumab-containing chemotherapeutic regimen. In such patients, alternate therapies should be considered.

Keywords: bevacizumab, high-grade glioma, malignant glioma

Received July 30, 2008; Accepted October 22, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.