Skip Navigation

Neuro-Oncology 2000 2(3):164-173; doi:10.1093/neuonc/2.3.164
© 2000 by Society
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiltshire, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Bigner, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wiltshire, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Bigner, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2000 by the Society forNeuro-Oncology

Comparative genetic patterns of glioblastoma multiforme: Potentialdiagnostic tool for tumor classification

Rodney N. Wiltshire, B.K. Ahmed Rasheed, Henry S. Friedman, Allan H. Friedman and Sandra H. Bigner1

Departments of Pathology (R.N.W., B.K.A.R., H.S.F.,S.H.B.), Surgery (H.S.F., A.H.F.), and Pediatrics (H.S.F.), Duke University, Durham, NC27710

1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sandra H. Bigner, DukeUniversity Medical Center, Department of Pathology, PO Box 3712, Durham, NC27710.


   Abstract

Cytogenetic and molecular genetic studies of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)have shown that the most frequent alterations are gains of chromosome 7,losses of 9p loci and chromosome 10, and gene amplification, primarily of theepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. Although this profileis potentially useful in distinguishing GBM from other tumor types, thetechniques used tend to be labor intensive, and some can detect only gains orlosses of genetic loci. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a powerfultechnique capable of identifying both gains and losses of DNA sequences. Thepresent study compares the CGH evaluation of 22 GBM with classic cytogenetics,loss of heterozygosity by allelotyping, and gene amplification by Southernblot analysis to determine the reliability of CGH in the geneticcharacterization of GBM. The CGH and karyotypic data were consistent inshowing gain of chromosome 7 accompanied by a loss of chromosome 10 as themost frequent abnormality, followed by a loss of 9p in 17 of 22 GBM cases.Loss of heterozygosity of chromosomes 10 (19/22) and 9p (9/22) loci confirmedthe underrepresentation by CGH. Genomic amplifications were observed by CGH in5 of the 10 cases where gene amplification was detected by Southern blotanalysis. The data show that CGH is equally reliable, compared with the moreestablished genetic methods, for recognizing the prominent genetic alterationsassociated with GBM and support its use as a plausible adjunct to gliomaclassification.

Received March 2, 2000; Accepted April 24, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neuro OncologyHome page
M. C.M. Kouwenhoven, T. Gorlia, J. M. Kros, A. Ibdaih, A. A. Brandes, J. E.C. Bromberg, K. Mokhtari, S. G. van Duinen, J. L. Teepen, P. Wesseling, et al.
Molecular analysis of anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors in a prospective randomized study: A report from EORTC study 26951
Neuro Oncology, December 1, 2009; 11(6): 737 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
V Martin, L Mazzucchelli, and M Frattini
An overview of the epidermal growth factor receptor fluorescence in situ hybridisation challenge in tumour pathology
J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2009; 62(4): 314 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncologyHome page
D. Kuga, M. Mizoguchi, Y. Guan, N. Hata, K. Yoshimoto, T. Shono, S. O. Suzuki, Y. Kukita, T. Tahira, S. Nagata, et al.
Prevalence of copy-number neutral LOH in glioblastomas revealed by genomewide analysis of laser-microdissected tissues
Neuro Oncology, December 1, 2008; 10(6): 995 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncologyHome page
Y.-H. Zhou, K. R. Hess, L. Liu, Mark. E. Linskey, and W.K. A. Yung
Modeling prognosis for patients with malignant astrocytic gliomas: Quantifying the expression of multiple genetic markers and clinical variables
Neuro Oncology, October 1, 2005; 7(4): 485 - 494.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. M. Nigro, A. Misra, L. Zhang, I. Smirnov, H. Colman, C. Griffin, N. Ozburn, M. Chen, E. Pan, D. Koul, et al.
Integrated Array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization and Expression Array Profiles Identify Clinically Relevant Molecular Subtypes of Glioblastoma
Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 65(5): 1678 - 1686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
R. N. Wiltshire, J. E. Herndon II, A. Lloyd, H. S. Friedman, D. D. Bigner, S. H. Bigner, and R. E. McLendon
Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Astrocytomas: Prognostic and Diagnostic Implications
J. Mol. Diagn., August 1, 2004; 6(3): 166 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. C. Burton, K. R. Lamborn, B. G. Feuerstein, M. Prados, J. Scott, P. Forsyth, S. Passe, R. B. Jenkins, and K. D. Aldape
Genetic Aberrations Defined by Comparative Genomic Hybridization Distinguish Long-Term from Typical Survivors of Glioblastoma
Cancer Res., November 1, 2002; 62(21): 6205 - 6210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. S. Bernard and C. T. Wittwer
Real-Time PCR Technology for Cancer Diagnostics
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2002; 48(8): 1178 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncologyHome page
N. Aldosari, R. N. Wiltshire, A. Dutra, E. Schrock, R. E. McLendon, H. S. Friedman, D. D. Bigner, and S. H. Bigner
Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic investigation of chromosomalabnormalities in human medulloblastoma cell lines and xenograft
Neuro Oncology, April 1, 2002; 4(2): 75 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.