© 2002 by Society
© 2002 by the Society forNeuro-Oncology
A phase II trial of thymidine and carboplatin for recurrent malignantglioma: A North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin,Madison, WI 53792 (H.I.R., M.M.); University ofCalifornia at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 (S.M.C., M.D.P.,K.N.); University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston, TX 77030 (W.K.A.Y., K.H.); University ofPittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (D.S.); Department ofNeurology, University of Michigan, MI 48109 (L.J., H.G.); University of Texas Southwestern at Dallas, Dallas, TX75390 (K.F.); University of Texas at San Antonio, SanAntonio, TX 78284 (J.G.K.); University of Californiaat Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (T.C.)
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to H. Ian Robins, Department ofMedicine, University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center K4/666, 600Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792.
| Abstract |
|---|
This phase II study in recurrent high-grade glioma evaluated the responserate, toxicities, and time to treatment failure of high-dose carboplatinmodulated by a 24-h infusion of thymidine (75 g/m2). The trial wasbased on preclinical data and a prior phase I study (J. Clin. Oncol.17, 2922-2931, 1999); a phase II recurrent high-grade glioma study wasinitiated in July of 1998. Thymidine was given over 24 h; carboplatin wasgiven over 20 min at hour 20 of the thymidine infusion. The starting dose ofcarboplatin had a value of 7 for the area under the curve (AUC), withallowance for dose escalation of 1 AUC unit per cycle if grade 2 toxicity wasobserved. Treatment cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. Accrual as ofSeptember 1999 was 45 patients [4 were unevaluable]: 76% with glioblastomamultiforme (GBM), 20% with anaplastic oligodendroglioma, 2% with mixed type,and 2% with anaplastic astrocytoma. Most patients had prior chemotherapy(78%). As observed in the earlier phase I study (in which carboplatinpharmacokinetics were unaltered by thymidine or antiseizure medications),thymidine was myeloprotective, resulting in a minimal need for dose reductionfor patients having a >2 grade toxicity (in only 4% of the courses oftreatment). Of 101 total courses, the number of courses (at the AUCs) was 3(5), 4 (6), 58 (7), 20 (8), 11 (9), and 5 (10). Grade 3 non-hematologictoxicities included headache (4%), altered consciousness (3%), fatigue (1%),and nausea (3%). Responses included 2 partial (1 oligodendroglioma, 1 GBM;5%); 3 minor (1 anaplastic astrocytoma, 2 GBM; 7.3%); 6 stable disease(14.6%); and 30 progressive disease (73.2%). For GBM patients, median survivalwas 23 weeks (with a 95% confidence interval of 20 to 50 weeks), andprogression-free survival was 8 weeks (with a 95% confidence interval of 7-16weeks). These results in GBM were comparable to other phase II GBM trials andthus do not represent a therapeutic advance in the treatment of GBM. Takencollectively, however, results are consistent with continued investigation ofthymidine in combination with chemotherapeutic agents for high-grade gliomaand other malignant diseases. The significant myeloprotection afforded bythymidine may have particular relevance to polychemotherapeutic regimens.
Received September 10, 2001; Accepted October 26, 2001
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Chang, K. R. Lamborn, J. G. Kuhn, W.K. A. Yung, M. R. Gilbert, P. Y. Wen, H. A. Fine, M. P. Mehta, L. M. DeAngelis, F. S. Lieberman, et al. Neurooncology clinical trial design for targeted therapies: Lessons learned from the North American Brain Tumor Consortium Neuro Oncology, August 1, 2008; 10(4): 631 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Grossman, A. O'Neill, M. Grunnet, M. Mehta, J. L. Pearlman, H. Wagner, M. Gilbert, H. B. Newton, and R. Hellman Phase III Study Comparing Three Cycles of Infusional Carmustine and Cisplatin Followed by Radiation Therapy With Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Carmustine in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial Glioblastoma Multiforme: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 2394 J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2003; 21(8): 1485 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

