Skip Navigation

Neuro-Oncology 2002 4(2):109-114; doi:10.1093/neuonc/4.2.109
© 2002 by Society
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robins, H. I.
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robins, H. I.
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2002 by the Society forNeuro-Oncology

A phase II trial of thymidine and carboplatin for recurrent malignantglioma: A North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study

H. Ian Robins2, Susan M. Chang, Michael D. Prados, W.K. Alfred Yung, Kenneth Hess, David Schiff, Harry Greenberg, Karen Fink, Kelly Nicolas, John G. Kuhn, Timothy Cloughesy, Larry Junck and Minesh Mehta

Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin,Madison, WI 53792 (H.I.R., M.M.); University ofCalifornia at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 (S.M.C., M.D.P.,K.N.); University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston, TX 77030 (W.K.A.Y., K.H.); University ofPittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (D.S.); Department ofNeurology, University of Michigan, MI 48109 (L.J., H.G.); University of Texas Southwestern at Dallas, Dallas, TX75390 (K.F.); University of Texas at San Antonio, SanAntonio, TX 78284 (J.G.K.); University of Californiaat Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (T.C.)

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to H. Ian Robins, Department ofMedicine, University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center K4/666, 600Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792.


   Abstract

This phase II study in recurrent high-grade glioma evaluated the responserate, toxicities, and time to treatment failure of high-dose carboplatinmodulated by a 24-h infusion of thymidine (75 g/m2). The trial wasbased on preclinical data and a prior phase I study (J. Clin. Oncol.17, 2922-2931, 1999); a phase II recurrent high-grade glioma study wasinitiated in July of 1998. Thymidine was given over 24 h; carboplatin wasgiven over 20 min at hour 20 of the thymidine infusion. The starting dose ofcarboplatin had a value of 7 for the area under the curve (AUC), withallowance for dose escalation of 1 AUC unit per cycle if grade 2 toxicity wasobserved. Treatment cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. Accrual as ofSeptember 1999 was 45 patients [4 were unevaluable]: 76% with glioblastomamultiforme (GBM), 20% with anaplastic oligodendroglioma, 2% with mixed type,and 2% with anaplastic astrocytoma. Most patients had prior chemotherapy(78%). As observed in the earlier phase I study (in which carboplatinpharmacokinetics were unaltered by thymidine or antiseizure medications),thymidine was myeloprotective, resulting in a minimal need for dose reductionfor patients having a >2 grade toxicity (in only 4% of the courses oftreatment). Of 101 total courses, the number of courses (at the AUCs) was 3(5), 4 (6), 58 (7), 20 (8), 11 (9), and 5 (10). Grade 3 non-hematologictoxicities included headache (4%), altered consciousness (3%), fatigue (1%),and nausea (3%). Responses included 2 partial (1 oligodendroglioma, 1 GBM;5%); 3 minor (1 anaplastic astrocytoma, 2 GBM; 7.3%); 6 stable disease(14.6%); and 30 progressive disease (73.2%). For GBM patients, median survivalwas 23 weeks (with a 95% confidence interval of 20 to 50 weeks), andprogression-free survival was 8 weeks (with a 95% confidence interval of 7-16weeks). These results in GBM were comparable to other phase II GBM trials andthus do not represent a therapeutic advance in the treatment of GBM. Takencollectively, however, results are consistent with continued investigation ofthymidine in combination with chemotherapeutic agents for high-grade gliomaand other malignant diseases. The significant myeloprotection afforded bythymidine may have particular relevance to polychemotherapeutic regimens.

Received September 10, 2001; Accepted October 26, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neuro OncologyHome page
S. M. Chang, K. R. Lamborn, J. G. Kuhn, W.K. A. Yung, M. R. Gilbert, P. Y. Wen, H. A. Fine, M. P. Mehta, L. M. DeAngelis, F. S. Lieberman, et al.
Neurooncology clinical trial design for targeted therapies: Lessons learned from the North American Brain Tumor Consortium
Neuro Oncology, August 1, 2008; 10(4): 631 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. A. Grossman, A. O'Neill, M. Grunnet, M. Mehta, J. L. Pearlman, H. Wagner, M. Gilbert, H. B. Newton, and R. Hellman
Phase III Study Comparing Three Cycles of Infusional Carmustine and Cisplatin Followed by Radiation Therapy With Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Carmustine in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial Glioblastoma Multiforme: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 2394
J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2003; 21(8): 1485 - 1491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.