Skip Navigation

Neuro-Oncology 2003 5(3):188-196; doi:10.1215/S1152851702000297
© 2003 by Society
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hukin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hukin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2003 by the Society forNeuro-Oncology

Leptomeningeal dissemination at diagnosis of pediatric low-gradeneuroepithelial tumors

Juliette Hukin1, Joao Siffert, Henry Cohen, Linda Velasquez, David Zagzag and Jeffrey Allen

Division of Neurology and Oncology, Department ofPediatrics, Children's and Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada(J.H.); CNS Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY 10017(J.S.); 3629 6th Avenue West, Seattle, WA 98119(H.C.); Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, BethIsrael Medical Center, New York, NY 10128 (L.V., J.A.); andNew York University Hospital, New York, NY 10016 (D.Z.);USA

1 Addresss correspondence to Juliette Hukin, K3, Neurology Division, Children'sand Women's Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada(jhukin{at}cw.bc.ca).


   Abstract

The goal of this study was to describe the demographic, histologic, andprognostic features of children with low-grade neuroepithelial tumors (LGN) ofthe CNS presenting with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) at diagnosis. Weidentified 528 newly diagnosed LGN children, 13 (3%) of whom had LM atdiagnosis. LM was defined by neuroimaging, clinical evidence, and/or biopsy.The charts were reviewed and patients contacted to validate the demographicdata, treatment, and clinical status. The distribution of LM patients byprimary tumor site was diencephalon, 5; cerebrum, 2; spinal cord, 3;brainstem, 2; and cerebellum, 1. Six of 8 patients with LM had durableobjective responses to chemotherapy. The 5-year progression-free survival ofpatients with LM at diagnosis was 17%, compared to 85% (95% CI, 80%-91%) forthose with localized LGN who had a gross total resection and 51% (95% CI,44%-52%) for those with localized LGN who had less aggressive surgery(P < 0.0001). Only 1 of these 13 LM patients died. The 5-yearoverall survival of the localized LGN group with a gross total resection was97% (95% CI, 92%-99.9%), and that of the localized LGN group with lessaggressive surgery was 88% (95% CI, 84%-95%) (P = 0.004). The 3%frequency of LM at diagnosis is likely an underestimate since patients withnewly diagnosed LGN were not routinely staged. We suggest that staging beconsidered in the following circumstances: diencephalic primary site,unexplained hydrocephalus, clinical features suggestive of LM, and beforeadjuvant therapy is initiated. The prognosis for children with LM at diagnosisis favorable, and its identification alters therapeutic strategies.

Received July 10, 2002; Accepted February 10, 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.